I’ve never really been worried about AI books flooding the market. Why? Because most of these books eventually get buried by the algorithm. The stories are often too similar, too formulaic, and don’t give readers a reason to come back for more. The algorithm can push a book to the surface, but if readers aren’t enjoying it, it can kill discovery just as quickly.
That said… If someone can pump out 200 books in a year and sell 50,000 copies, I’d be lying if I said a tiny part of me didn’t want to throw my laptop out the window. 
Because how exactly are human authors supposed to compete with that kind of volume?
While building NovelNutt, I’ve actually been thinking about this a lot.
Not from a “Let’s catch the AI authors!” perspective.
Honestly, that sounds exhausting.
I’m more interested in finding ways to identify spam without accidentally punishing human authors.
Because right now, everyone seems obsessed with detecting AI.
I’m obsessed with not falsely accusing innocent writers.
As both an author and a tech entrepreneur, Developing tools is literally part of my job.
I have no interest in telling authors they can’t use AI.
Need help polishing? Use it.
Need help organising your notes? Use it.
Need help spotting plot holes? Use it.
Need help fixing a typo and grammar that somehow survived ten edits?
Definitely use it.
But there is a difference between using AI as a tool and pressing a button to generate hundreds of books like you’re printing flyers.
That’s not innovation. That’s spam.
And unlike a book created through genuine human creativity, fully AI-generated works may not even qualify for copyright protection.
At the end of the day, readers deserve great stories.
And authors deserve to be judged on the books they write.
So please, write responsibly. Judge responsibly.
And please… don’t publish 200 books before breakfast.
